The lagoon project is in the early stages. It has already drawn significant comment both in favor and in opposition.

All are entitled to express opinions on whether the project should go forward. From a review of the letters which opposed the project and were published in last week’s Times, however, it appears that the courtesy and respect filter which applies to free speech may have been somewhat lacking.

For 20 years I have represented clients in Fountain Hills. During that time I have worked with Council members Cecil Yates and Art Tolis. I worked with Art when he was on the Planning and Zoning Commission and I worked with Cecil when we both served on that Commission.

In years of working with Art I have found him to be committed to the best interests of the town. I also know him as a good citizen, serving as the president of the morning Rotary Club and working on numerous civic projects.

Parking, costs and whether the project involves a proper use of resources are legitimate concerns. Vague “concerns” or personal attacks are not.

I am troubled when Council member Tolis’ support of this project is attacked not on the merit, but on the basis that he has “lost his mind,” it is a “dumb idea” or is a “colossal folly.” Those are not supportable grounds for objection.

Perhaps we should allow the review process to work. If the project doesn’t make sense, we should have confidence that our elected officials will recognize that fact and the project will not be approved.

In the meantime, let’s analyze what is presented and base opposition or support on a factual basis.