In 2003, Sen. Barack Hussein Obama was adamantly against a strike on Iraq’s dictator Saddam Hussein, who had used WMD gas killing 50,000 of his own people (Kurds). Obama called it the “stupid war.”

U.S. evidence was believed by all of the 50- country coalition Bush had gathered. Bush also had the approval of Congress, United Nations, U.N. Security Council, as well as 72 percent of the American people…yet the liberals skewered Bush for the attack.

To this day, they are angered for going into Iraq for WMD, even though we had just suffered the horror of 9/11, were under terrorist threat, plus waging the new War on Terror.

Today, Obama insists we must attack Syria for the killing of 1,400 people with WMD (many believe the Islamic rebels used them to frame Assad), not caring that over 100,000 had been killed in their civil war, and where the U.S. is under no threat from Syria.

Obama drew a “red line,” but has decided to attack a Mid-East country, perhaps starting WWIII (the world against the U.S.), all by his lonesome! He may get France to provide croissants, but the United Nations and U.N. Security council are not in agreement.

Now, he flip-flopped and decided to ask Congress, even though he said he would attack no matter what they say, and has less than 30 percent of Americans behind him.

Gallup polls show “the largest opposition for military action ever registered!” Yet the liberals give him a pass as always.

As we face the anniversary of 9/11/01, it’s astounding that Obama chooses to attack, siding with radicals, many linked to terrorists, like the Al-Qaeda jihadists who attacked the U.S. that day. He should care about getting the terrorists who killed four Americans in Benghazi last year!