Solange Whitehead, Scottsdale City Council member

Photo submitted by Solange Whitehead

OPINION – Yesterday, a council majority quite literally voted to put residents last.

At 10 p.m., Councilman Barry Graham led the effort to eliminate Scottsdale’s longstanding tradition of allowing residents to speak on non-agendized items at the beginning of council meetings — a tradition that has defined our small-town character for decades.

Mayor Lisa Borowsky, Councilwoman Maryann McAllen and I spoke passionately about the importance of hearing from our residents. As did hundreds of residents who sent thoughtful emails. In the past, public comments led to positive actions by the City Council. But these real benefits were ignored.

Their claim that other changes “expand” public access (Increasing the number of speaking slots at the end of a meeting does not expand access because most residents simply can’t stay) only adds insult to injury. Very few residents have the ability to spend an entire Tuesday night at City Hall waiting for a three-minute opportunity to share their important concerns. This decision effectively shuts out many senior citizens, students with homework, parents preparing dinner and caring for families, and anyone relying on the trolley to attend a meeting.

For context, the Town of Fountain Hills recently eliminated public comment not related to agenda items entirely — an unacceptable decision. But at least Fountain Hills councilmembers were honest about not wanting residents to have a voice. Last night’s action in Scottsdale accomplishes the same outcome, just without the honesty.

Our greatest achievements began as visionary ideas from our residents, championed by city council members who listened to and respected them. Last night, a majority of the Council abandoned the very principles that built our world-class community and literally voted to put residents last.

Please submit comments at yourvalley.net/letters or email them to AzOpinions@iniusa.org. We are committed to publishing a wide variety of reader opinions, as long as they meet our Civility Guidelines.