Town officials had pulled a planned discussion regarding the proposed school district bond election from the Town Council’s Sept. 19 agenda at the last minute, but that did no stop supporters and opponents from voicing their opinions on the issue during the call to the public segment.

Town Clerk Linda Mendenhall read the names of numerous people who had sent comment cards via email as well as some present who did not wish to speak. Mendenhall reported receiving 32 comments in support of the bond with seven opposed. One other supported the bond but opposed a council resolution in support.

Those opposing the bond focused on an auditor’s report describing significant deficiencies related to district finances. The audit covered a period for the previous administration from which the superintendent and FHUSD mutually agreed to part ways back in April 2022. Current administrators say work is well underway to correct those deficiencies.

Barry Wolborsky cited the auditor’s report, saying there were too many deficiencies. “There are just too many issues; we need fiscal responsibility,” Wolborsky said. “There are eight pages of deficiencies, and these are not little deficiencies.

“We cannot validate this until there is a new audit report.”

A couple of speakers cited student safety as a key reason for supporting the bond.

“There is insufficient funding from the state,” Tom Lindsey said. “We have to give (students) the best buildings and most secure and safe buildings. This is not just a Fountain Hills challenge.”

It was the Fountain Hills Chamber of Commerce providing the biggest endorsement. Chamber CEO/President Betsy LaVoie read a letter of support signed by the Chamber’s Board of Directors.

“We understand that a thriving school district is a cornerstone of a vibrant community,” the letter states. “When families consider relocating, the strength of the local school district is one of their primary criteria. A strong school district enhances our business community as well. It attracts skilled professionals and their families, boosting the local workforce and talent pool.

“The Fountain Hills Chamber of Commerce recognizes that supporting the school district is an investment in our collective future. By endorsing this bond, we are fostering growth, prosperity and an enduring small-town community spirit.”

School District Superintendent Dr. Cain Jagodzinski made a presentation at the council meeting, which primarily outlined the “state of the district” with no direct reference to the bond question (see separate story). There was an item on the agenda for consideration of a resolution in support of the bond election. That item was removed at the last minute due to legal concerns related to state law prohibiting municipalities from expending resources in support or opposition to a ballot question or candidate.

That item also raised the ire of some residents. Crystal Cavanagh said she was shocked to see the item on the agenda and said some on the council had no right to pressure other council members to publicly state for the record how they would vote on the issue.