Monarchs inherit their positions. Democracies vest politicians with power because they are chosen by the voters. Political positions are not inherited, except in Fountain Hills. We are about to see how an entrenched interest group keeps its power by anointing a successor to a political position.

Councilmember Cecil Yates is running for mayor. He was elected to council in 2016. His term expires in 2020. The signals were clear when Yates ran in in 2016 – his council election is only a prelude, a run for mayor is assured. Mayor Kavanagh assured it.

By Arizona law, Yates must resign his council position to “officially” run for mayor. If he resigns before May 1, the voters get to elect his replacement. When he resigns on or after May 1, four members of council will appoint a successor to serve the remainder of Yates’ term until 2020. The voters will have no input.

There is no “if” in the equation, only the “when.” I believe Yates will resign after May 1 and the successor has already been chosen. Their identities are not difficult to discern. They are the developers and their friends who control the council. They will control Yates’ successor.

The process that will unfold cheapens the seat on council. It will diminish and cheapen the person anointed to fill it. The process that will occur is an insult to the voters and shows a lack of integrity by those involved in the process.

Why would we expect anything different? The grip on the council by the entrenched developers will not be relinquished willingly. Entrusting the choice to voters is too risky. The pre-determined crowning of a loyal successor assures the developer block will maintain its political power. Royal power corrupts the democratic process.