Log in

Overlooked

Over the past few weeks social media has heated up on the Daybreak issue. I am dismayed that rather than an honest, factual and civil discussion, we have seen name-calling and snide remarks. This simply is not appropriate behavior if we are going to have a legitimate debate on Daybreak. So here – without rancor or anger – I just want to state a few simple facts that have been totally overlooked or incorrectly stated.

Fact: The developers do not own this land. They have a contingency on it.

Fact: It is 23 buildings and garages on 23 acres with a 25-foot setback from Palisades.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Overlooked

Posted

Over the past few weeks social media has heated up on the Daybreak issue. I am dismayed that rather than an honest, factual and civil discussion, we have seen name-calling and snide remarks. This simply is not appropriate behavior if we are going to have a legitimate debate on Daybreak. So here – without rancor or anger – I just want to state a few simple facts that have been totally overlooked or incorrectly stated.

Fact: The developers do not own this land. They have a contingency on it.

Fact: It is 23 buildings and garages on 23 acres with a 25-foot setback from Palisades.

Fact: The five-story hotel was actually designed to go down the East side of the hill as to blend; they worked with the neighbors to accommodate issues.

Fact: The OSR (open space land) was already there and takes a waiver to change. It is not the developers giving this land up. Buildable land was 23 acres.

Fact: It will add 2,500 cars/day to the Palisades traffic.

Fact: The proposed roundabout will be 500-600 feet from Shea and Palisades.

Fact: The hillside will be leveled by 30 feet with 57 feet of infill into the southern culvert.

Fact: The plan does not meet over a dozen of the standards of the General Plan/Zoning building requirements.

Fact: The P&Z Commission denied the Minor General Plan amendment and the rezoning of this property.

I encourage you to read the General Plan, the zoning ordinances and each of the three PAD Submittals by the developers including the comments and recommendations from the P&Z Department, then make your decision.

Share with others


Have an opinion on this story? Click here to send a letter to our editors.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here