Let’s focus on uniting, not dividing, Fountain Hills

I’m writing in response to the proposal to rename the Fountain Hills Community Center after Charlie Kirk. While individuals may choose to support or admire his work, public facilities like the Community Center, library, Dark Sky observatory and Town Hall should remain inclusive, neutral spaces — free from political, religious, or ideological affiliation.

These facilities belong to everyone. They serve diverse members of the community with different backgrounds, beliefs and political views. Naming a public building after a prominent political figure introduces unnecessary division into spaces meant to foster connection and civic engagement.

It also raises important questions about the town’s established policies for naming public buildings. Shouldn’t there be a public process — such as forums or surveys of regular users — before such a major change? A decision like this should reflect broad community consensus, not just the current political majority of the Town Council.

If there is a desire to honor Mr. Kirk, a more appropriate option would be a commemorative plaque or dedication at a private venue, such as a local church or organization that aligns with his message. This would recognize his impact without politicizing a shared civic space.

Let’s preserve the purpose and integrity of our public institutions. They should remain welcoming to all residents — free from partisan affiliations — and focused on uniting, not dividing, our community.

Please submit comments at yourvalley.net/letters or email them to AzOpinions@iniusa.org. We are committed to publishing a wide variety of reader opinions, as long as they meet our Civility Guidelines.