One of the first things Skillicorn did when elected was to orchestrate firing the town lobbyist, the town’s legislative consultant. So, I wasn’t surprised when Skillicorn and the Republican Club advised voters to vote "No" on Proposition 479. The club claimed the plan spends 60% on transit, it’s actually 37%.

Skillicorn’s recent YouTube video condemning Proposition 479 transit is short-sighted as can be, using bus service backdrop that council has voted to discontinue in 2025. Preceding Propositions 300 and 400 have provided Fountain Hills and the region with necessary ADA, paratransit, and Give-a-Lift resources. Granted, Fountain Hills has experimented with Express bus service unsuccessfully, but Skillicorn wants to throw the baby out with the bathwater. That demonstrates his typical lack of regional understanding. Skillicorn, Toth and Friedel have little use for the federally mandated Maricopa Association of Governments role. Dickey and McMahon do – they learn how regional programs affect Fountain Hills.

Can the Republican Club defend their blanket “no” on Prop 479? They must not understand Fountain Hills benefits from regional investments in transportation. Are they ignoring the contributions this continuation will make for the regional freeway system, arterial street improvements (of which Fountain Hills will benefit), and other investments in safety, connectivity and technology over another 20 years? The Club, like Skillicorn, can’t see past their "no to any tax" stand even when it’s in everyone’s best interest. I never hear them complain about trips across Valley on the 101, 202, 303, I-10, I-17, or SR60.

Wonder why 29 mayors, tribal representatives, the county and other leaders unanimously agreed that this region plan is best, but not Skillicorn or some Fountain Hills Republicans?  

Make sure you can still drive wherever/whenever you want, safely and efficiently! Vote yes on Proposition 479.

Reader reactions, pro or con, are welcomed at AzOpinions@iniusa.org.