fountain-hills-independent logo
Log in

Hearing officer

In Ryan Winslett’s article about Pam Aister it is important to note who paid for the hearing officer.

You guessed it -- the district did.

So just imagine if the hearing officer voted against the district, do you think she would be engaged again? Just a thought.

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.

Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Hearing officer

Posted
Brad Stern

In Ryan Winslett’s article about Pam Aister it is important to note who paid for the hearing officer.

You guessed it -- the district did.

So just imagine if the hearing officer voted against the district, do you think she would be engaged again? Just a thought.

Share with others

Have an opinion on this story? Click here to send a letter to our editors.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

Other items that may interest you

Fountain Hills councilman’s actions appalling

Arizona voters protected abortion rights, Washington can still threaten women’s health

Elections have consequences

Say yes to success and support Fountain Hills Unified

Most popular stories in Fountain Hills

Question of the Week: Are Valley communities planning wisely?

Neutrality is not secularism

Golf and water conservation in Fountain Hills

Schweikert has abdicated congressional responsibilities to Trump