The recent article in The Fountain Hills Times, “Town Budget of $38.9,” omitted a crucial part of the budget: The source of the income needed to fund the proposed expenses. This is important information that most readers are interested in.
Their support of the budget will depend on a fair, responsible income proposal, a balanced budget and what it will cost them. The traditional budget approach of a primary focus on expenditure, easily accepting deficit spending and an unbalanced budget is not in the best interests of the town.
You must be a member to read this story.
Join our family of readers starting at $5 for your first month and support local, unbiased journalism.
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
Register to comment
Click here create a free account for posting comments.
Note that free accounts do not include access to premium content on this site.
I am anchor
Budget
Posted
Edward Cohen
The recent article in The Fountain Hills Times, “Town Budget of $38.9,” omitted a crucial part of the budget: The source of the income needed to fund the proposed expenses. This is important information that most readers are interested in.
Their support of the budget will depend on a fair, responsible income proposal, a balanced budget and what it will cost them. The traditional budget approach of a primary focus on expenditure, easily accepting deficit spending and an unbalanced budget is not in the best interests of the town.
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here