2024 is an election year in Fountain Hills. Choices must be made. Town Council meetings often highlight contrasts that voters should consider. The recent council study session to discuss the FY25 budget was a lesson in contrasts.
Mayor Dickey showed clear understanding of the proposed budget and had specific questions to ask about expenditures and revenues. One discussion clearly defined her preparation as compared to that of Councilman Friedel.
Consider street improvements on La Montana and Palisades. Mayor Dickey had questions about the costs based on staff recommendations which, in turn, were taken from a comprehensive consultant study (previously brought to council).
In contrast to the Mayor, Councilman Friedel seemed vague, and at one point asked if staff could provide some direction, maybe even do a study. Another study? But a study had previously been done, its findings available to council and included in the budget.
How could Councilman Friedel have missed that key point? He asked the Public Works director questions that seemed uninformed. Was this tactical because he didn't like the project, or had he simply not done his homework?
The councilman further commented that traffic levels did not justify the project; proposed improvements were not safe; and that the town could not fund the work for six years. But these points appear baseless. The recommendation will create a shovel-ready project, ready to roll out when funding, including grant funding, becomes available.
Mayor Dickey vigorously asserted that the study was based upon key principles, including public safety. Likely ADA/safety grant funding could significantly enhance the project and reduce the town's cost.
Bottom line: elected Town Council positions are both an honor and a duty. Each councilman accepts the duty of due diligence. Be prepared. Do your homework. Read reports. Know what you're talking about.
Reader reactions, pro or con, are welcomed at AzOpinions@iniusa.org.
