Log in

Sign Ordinance: P&Z recommends changes

Posted 9/21/21

The Planning and Zoning Commission last week took a step toward cleaning up some of the outstanding issues related to the sign regulations in the Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance.

The …

You must be a member to read this story.

Join our family of readers for as little as $5 per month and support local, unbiased journalism.


Already have an account? Log in to continue.

Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here

Otherwise, follow the link below to join.

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.

For $6.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Sign Ordinance: P&Z recommends changes

Posted

The Planning and Zoning Commission last week took a step toward cleaning up some of the outstanding issues related to the sign regulations in the Town of Fountain Hills Zoning Ordinance.

The commission voted unanimously to recommend the changes proposed by staff as they relate to A-frame and T-frame signs, post and board signs and directional/yard signs. When the Town Council approved other changes to the sign ordinance in May, these are areas where businesses and Realtors still had issues relating to the proposed ban of such signs in the rights-of-way within town.

Development Services Director John Wesley said in considering the amendments he wanted to remain true to the goal to avoid clutter and maintain health and safety. He said he also wanted to consider the council’s stated desire to keep the signs out of the right-of-way.

He proposed that the Plat 208 area (downtown bounded by El Lago, Saguaro and Palisades boulevards and La Montana Drive) be defined as a pedestrian area that allows A-frame and T-frame signs on the sidewalk adjacent to the business as well as at least three feet from any curb or pavement edge.

Wesley said they would also encourage businesses to use permanent projecting wall signs in lieu of temporary signs on the street.

Commissioner Rod Watts Jr. suggested they consider a blanket encroachment permit to cover the entire downtown area to encourage the wall signs.

Commissioner Clayton Corey suggested staff put together an information pamphlet that includes artwork already prepared that shows areas where the temporary signs are already permitted outside the right-of-way and adjacent to businesses.

In suggesting a motion for the council recommendation, the commission made the additional proposals they discussed but were not included in the ordinance language.

“I think we are as close as we are going to get,” Watts said. “I’d like to move this forward.”

Commission Chair Peter Gray made a motion that included additional proposals including:

*Post and board signs be permitted within the right-of-way with a three-foot setback from the curb or pavement in residential areas.

*A blanket encroachment permit for the town center area.

*An exhibit publication outlining where signs may be placed on commercial property not considered the right-of-way.

*A six-foot clearance around signs on the sidewalk.

The recommendation was forwarded to the council for its consideration at a later date.